:: Artigo completo: https://doi.org/10.29391/2024.103.008
Part 2 complements the FEM developed in Part 1 by comparing simulated welding results with experiments to validate the model
Abstract
In-service welding simulations were carried out using a multiphysics finite element analysis (FEA). Calculated data as temperature and thermal cycles were validated by comparing them with experimental welding results carried out in a carbon steel pipe attached to a water loop. Two in-service welding cases were tested using the GMAW-P process with and without the assistance of induction preheating. The molten zone of weld macrographs and the simulated models were matched with excellent accuracy. The great agreement between the simulation and experimental molten zone generated a maximum error in the peak temperature of 1%, while in the cooling curve, the error was about 10% at lower temperatures. A higher hardness zone appeared in the weld’s toe within the CGHAZ, where the maximum induction preheating temperature achieved was 90°C with a power of 35 kW. Induction preheating reduced the maximum hardness from 390 HV to 339 HV.
Keywords: Type-B Sleeve Repair; Welding Modeling; Finite Element Analysis; GMAW-P for In-Service Welding.
Referência:
RIFFEL, K. C.; SILVA, R. H. G.; RAMIREZ, A. J.; ACUNA, A. F. F.; DALPIAZ, G.; PAES, M. T. P.. Multiphysics Simulation of In-Service Welding and Induction Preheating: Part 2. WELDING JOURNAL, WELDING RESEARCH, volume 103 - serie 3 p. 85-93. 2024. https://doi.org/10.29391/2024.103.008